Scott Noel Gallery Talk

SFFA is delighted to share a recording of Scott Noel’s recent gallery talk at the University of Lynchburg. The event, part of the Philip Geiger: Retrospective exhibition at the Daura Museum of Art, offered a thoughtful look at Geiger’s life’s work and his influence as both an artist and a teacher.

Scott Noel, a longtime colleague and friend of Geiger, spoke with depth and warmth about the painter’s legacy, reflecting on the themes, techniques, and personal vision that defined his practice. His talk provided audiences with a richer understanding of Geiger’s contributions to representational painting and the enduring impact of his career.

The talk was filmed by Thomas C. Canard, Museum Assistant at the Daura Museum of Art, and we’re grateful to be able to share it with a wider audience. We invite you to watch the video and revisit this memorable moment from the weekend.

Frank Galuszka

Paintings often don’t take you where the artist intends.  The domestic interiors of Philip Geiger take me to Olean, New York, a small city tucked into the westernmost corner of the state.  They take me to a house I knew as a child.  The destination of family road trips.  A house luxuriant with space and light, with less than what you would expect as a minimum of furniture and decoration, with nothing on the walls but light coming all ninety three million miles through open winows to put on its brakes on pale painted surfaces.  A generous roofed porch wrapped halfway around, everything was big, generous, muscular, big-beamed, and free.  

Me and my brother Bobby met Larry, Craig and Shelly,  even smaller than us, and each of us kids enveloped by sunlight and space.  No coziness, only freedom. Parents hardly remembered, hardly seen, hardly around,  except for sitting at a big solid table with whatever big unceremonious meal was about to happen, us in bathing suits mostly, it being summer, everything big, bright and simple.  Space enough to run or twist all through the house without collisions.  

Space and light were so dominant as to obstruct time.  As though time had never been invited into the house.  Houses outside were equally big, equally timeless.  The parents were friends of the parents, from the war, American men both, with war brides both, one a blonde force of nature, like sunshine itself, the other inward, moody, but for a bright passing smile.  Shelly did cartwheels in what would have been a living room had it a carpet or couch.  

Geiger’s paintings take me back there, the kids in the paintings are so much like the kids I remember in Olean. Taking up so little space in a careless space, the indoor architecture is something like the wild, both in his paintings and in that house in which locks and closed windows were unthinkable. The family meets like drifters on the plains.

Vermeer, Sargent, Velasquez, Koch, Morandi, Bonnard; I could argue for each of them.  Domestic interactions, sometimes disagreements or confidences that often do not include children.  A shaking free of edges.  

Is it expressionist, the subtle deliberate drag of a brush that contradicts the finicky fussy containments that stifle so many contemporary realist or representational paintings submerging the subjectivity of figures within objectivities of line, edge and anatomy, where their neglected expressions and souls give way to ego and easy-to-follow execution.  These figures, Phil Geiger’s figures, have voices as well as limbs, faces and torsos.  They have will, and there is often a good-hearted contest of wills at work in the paintings. Isolation is overcome or eliminated.  There is wistfulness but not permanent melancholy. No one in these paintings will forever be alone. 

A household interior of thresholds, hallways and intersecting rooms, large spaces high on light, that has become a theater of relationships. Families and extended families, as brother and sister visit, or friends.  It is the supremacy of the young family, the family in the finding itself in the full of life, in the course of the robust current of well-being, that, unlike the novel, the painting ( and the painting’s narrative) does just fine without trouble or stress, here there is not added sweetness, no proclamation, the goodness and warmth and life is not self-conscious, and clearly, we are moving through life.  Time, finally appearing,  is admittedly fleeting, in its flight captured, its instants cannot be comprehended and structured, they are fragmentary moments only, not narratives with beginnings and ends, and the commitment to life includes.  These paintings are not about analysis but experience, the experience of life, evidence of the wisdom of the song that sings “how little it matters how little we know.”  The impossibility of comprehensive knowledge is not only forgiven, it is a liberating pleasure, as in its forgiveness we are free to be alive in whatever arriving and vanishing present the painter awards us. 

Every trace of life is holographic, the all is in everything, every chuckle, glance and gesture, every choice, never chaos but flow, never digital but analog, The sympathetic look of the artist is included: it is a starker version, more American in its culturally sparse setting, but fresh, forever new, and as deeply true as any other embodiment of the joy of life in art.


Kathleen Hall

Steven Francis Coates’s ambitious project, The Gathering, brings together the work of a hundred regional and international artists. The show is without hierarchy; each artist is invited to exhibit a single piece. Featuring multiple generations and overlapping circles of influence and friendship, the exhibition has the feel of an expansive family reunion. It is fitting that the hosts, Steven and Lucia Coates, ran a successful bakery prior to starting a gallery. There is a spirit of generosity and inclusiveness to events at the gallery, which has become a meeting place for figurative-leaning artists, collectors, and enthusiasts in the region. At show openings, visitors are offered delicious food from their bakery, ensuring that everyone leaves feeling well-fed both visually and gustatorily.

The 2025 series of exhibitions at SFFA revolve around the esteemed Staunton-based observational painter, Philip Geiger. The Gathering runs concurrently with Geiger’s retrospective exhibition at the Daura Museum at the University of Lynchburg. Many of the artists in The Gathering are connected to Geiger in one way or another, as friends, family, students, and admirers. Others are known to Steven Francis through the greater Lynchburg art community, his painter wife Lucia, or through his years as a traveling photographer. Visitors to Lynchburg can enjoy both exhibitions and a suite of associated events, making the opening a weekend-long celebration. 

Philip Geiger is a painter of interior scenes of daily life, recalling both Dutch genre painting and later Intimist traditions in France. I suspect that this tradition is a touchstone for many others in The Gathering exhibition, as a fondness for everyday objects, places, and people runs through the diverse array of work. The repetition of familiar motifs can bring meaning and dignity to the mundane, but it can also engender innovation as it liberates the artist to focus on formalist concerns of color, paint handling, and compositional innovation. One must only think of the Impressionist painters of modern life and their artistic descendants – Cézanne and his mountain, Matisse’s windows, Picasso and Braque’s newspaper-scattered tabletops. 

The term “Intimist” is closely associated with the post-Impressionist painters Pierre Bonnard and Édouard Vuillard, who painted their domestic spheres almost exclusively. Their family members and close friends are the apparent subjects, but every other element within the scene - a bowl of fruit, a patterned wall, a landscape out the window, is imbued with equal vitality. The figures are deeply felt, and can carry a strong psychological charge, but the visual focus is often elsewhere, perhaps a lamp in the background, or a seemingly inconsequential negative shape. Frequently, the figures meld into the space around them, fused into the fabric of daily life.

Like Bonnard and Vuillard, Philip Geiger divides his attention equally amongst all elements in the picture plane. But whereas those Intimists preferred flat shapes of color, Geiger’s work expresses more of a sculptural response to space and form. When I look at Philip Geiger’s paintings, I get the sense that the light itself is a central character. In the later works especially, a patch of light on the wall or coming through a window is expressed with startling, thick strokes, giving presence to the immaterial. We enjoy the skillfully painted figures but do not get stuck on them; they serve as guideposts to help orient ourselves within the space and its carefully calibrated intervals. Instead of remaining on the outside as voyeurs, we are drawn into the picture because of the unity and interconnectedness of the whole space, where the voids are just as felt as the characters.

This democracy of attention applied to the humblest of subjects can be seen in other works in The Gathering. In “Chocolate Door”, John Lee paints a grim institutional building, teasing out a sumptuous variety of color reflected on the blank white walls, contained within the austere structure of repeated rectangles. In Peter Van Dyck’s “McDonald’s Parking Lot”, the viewer is so immediately pulled into its deep space full of painterly accretions and filigreed lines, that the drab iconography becomes an afterthought. Richard Crozier, a former colleague of Phil Geiger’s who has made a career out of painting his everyday surroundings in Charlottesville, presents a poetic meditation on a snowy day in “Winter View from Studio”, the interwoven pattern of fence, tree, and snow dissolving into a Monet-like abstract surface. 

Though observation is at the core of the exhibition, there are works that veer in a more imaginative direction. David Campbell’s “Pretending to Watch TV” presents a humorous, dollhouse-like riff on the domestic interior, populated by primitive figures with matchstick limbs. In “Path”, Brian Rego pulls and distorts the space of an otherwise ordinary landscape, creating a world that is both playful and ominous, and approaches the mythic quality of a Stanley Spencer. Margaret McCann’s “Freudian Still Life” presents a jumbled collection of symbolic objects, strangely scaled and connected by a sea of agitated white drapery, painted with a heightened clarity reminiscent of Northern Renaissance painting. 

For the casual observer, it is easy to conflate figurative painting with a kind of backwards-looking academicism.  Now that art is seen primarily on screens, it only takes a fraction of a second to mentally file a painting into one category or another, and to succumb to a general visual fatigue. What this exhibition offers, to those that make the journey to see it, is an immersion in a great variety of tactile responses to the observed world. There is exquisite craftsmanship to be seen, nuanced vision and hard-won battles with the fickle nature of perception. The impact of the work is ever more surprising and immediate because of the intimacy of the venue itself, devoid of formality or pretentiousness. Anyone who takes the time to truly look is invited to join the conversation.



Kathleen Hall is a painter and educator based in Roanoke, Virginia.


Elizabeth Geiger

Being married to Phil has left endless artistic memories and influence. Reducing this history to a blog post seems impossible, but here are the essential things that come to mind when I think of Phil and his painting.

First is his steady, regular devotion to his studio practice. He’s worked almost every day at some aspect of artmaking. Not always painting - it could be cleaning his studio, rearranging a room he was going to paint in, sanding down old work, sketching or looking at art books. All been an important part of his process. He didn’t have to put in a full day either, sometimes only one or two hours. What was important was showing up.

Another habit of Phil’s - horrifying to me - was how he could throw away old work. It wasn’t often, but from time to time I’d see drawings, whole sketchbooks and paintings in the trash can. (And yes, I’d pull some out) People started dumpster diving near his studio in downtown Charlottesville for this reason. Eventually he would gesso a large “X” across anything he threw away, and sometimes cut drawings or panels in half. I guess he needed to let go of ideas he was no longer interested in pursuing. I struggle to let go of anything. This studio purging technique was also used at home. The first time I entered his “bachelor” house, it was so empty I thought he’d just moved in. “Where is your stuff?” I asked him, confused. We’re opposites in this way. It took me a long time to understand what he instinctively knew: Letting go of old things clears the way for new ideas. He’s always been willing to wipe out a painting and start over at any time.

Phil, although a marvelous and dedicated teacher, couldn’t be called an evangelist. He hasn’t been driven to convert anyone to painting. In fact, he almost majored in music in college. He’s talked a lot of shop with other artists, but is happy to talk about anything else, usually history, with non artists: neighbors, family members and our children. Although we had art supplies around, we never encouraged our young children to become artists. I can only recall taking Martin and Helen to museums a few times when they were little. Phil has ultimately felt his artwork was his best tool for influence. It must’ve worked, since both kids ended up going to art school.

Phil could always look at paintings for a long time. I spent many a day in museums listening to him and his friends discuss a handful of pictures for hours. Over time, this kind of focus rubbed off on me and I too became a museum junkie. All I need now is to see one good painting and it’s worth the trip. That can feed me in the studio for a long time. In fact, too many good paintings now feels like a fire hose. It’s too much to take in.

I can only recall Phil working on a painting of mine once. I was in the basement painting a still life with a light tablecloth and green apples. It was near a window since I only used natural light then. He told me numerous times my darks weren’t dark enough. As usual, I had slightly darkened a few shadows, focusing instead on the all important “color” of the objects. Finally, he couldn’t take it anymore. He grabbed a brush, dipped it into a blob of raw umber and jabbed it under one of the apples in my painting. “It’s THAT dark.” was all he said before walking away. Huh. Three words, and a whole tonal world opened up for me. I just couldn’t see the dark tones before that. Telling me didn’t help. I had to be shown.

Ultimately, Phil’s biggest artistic influence on me has been an open mindedness, probably from his training and having had great teachers himself. He’s always been able to look at any kind of painting and have something to say about it, more importantly, something to appreciate about it. Abstract, photography derived, large invented and small observational work. I’ve seen him thoughtfully critique all of these approaches. That was a great model for a young artist like me who was very sure of my opinions, my likes and especially my dislikes. Phil has never been threatened by other styles and gleaned from many sources for his own painting. This has allowed him to refresh and reinvent his process while painting the same subjects for his entire career. I can only hope to do the same.

By Brian Rego

This note accompanies “Observation & Invention,” a group exhibition at SFFA Tradewynd Gallery, on view May 28th - July 26, 2025.

I was introduced to Phil Geiger’s paintings through his long-time friend, Scott Noel. I found his work to be bold, strikingly economical, elusive, and deeply felt. It wasn’t until a few years after graduate school that I had the opportunity to meet Phil and his wife, Liz Geiger, who, like Phil, is a painter who has been an inspiration to my practice. They are a rare combination of accomplished, but humble, down-to-earth people who engage with beauty through the common moments of everyday living. Though when expressed through their poetic sensibilities in paint and imagery, those moments are anything but common. Curiosity, joy, wonder, and the willingness to plumb the depths of meaning through paint and imagery are only the beginning of what gives substance to Phil’s technical range in expressing the visual phenomena of what it means to see. I am incredibly grateful for the legacy Phil leaves in his life’s work, but even more so for the ways he has unknowingly gifted me with his kindness, generosity, and friendship.

By Edmond Praybe

This note accompanies “Family of Things,” a solo exhibition featuring recent work by Edmond Praybe at SFFA Main Street Gallery. On view May 2- May 31, 2025.

Phil Geiger is a sneaky painter. I mean that in the best sense of the phrase. He gently draws you closer with the quiet approachability of his subjects - a woman on a bed, a group of figures seated on a table, a recognizable street view - and the seeming ease of the composition and then, once you’re invested in the scene, you’re hit with their presence as paintings, as painted objects. Here, ‘seeming ease’ is the key because, much like Matisse, the ease is not that of the first strike, but of the feeling of inevitability that comes from well-considered, hard-fought painting decisions made over time, gradually inching things into their proper place. The sneakiness is that these ‘realist’ paintings are just as much about the beauty of paint and color as they are about the images that the paint represents. A white table is not just a flat unmodulated plane of whitish tone, but a carefully keyed arrangement of kaleidoscopic colors that comes together to register in our eyes as a ‘whitish table.’ A warm, seemingly translucent lamp light is a slab of orangey peach paint and the cool shadow of a face a beautifully pitched blue gray.

The color and the surface sing in Phil’s paintings. The way he handles the paint builds form. Moving rapidly in hatches against the contour of a figure or in a bold swipe following the edge of an arm, the touch sculpts. Light pervades the scenes, but rather than dissolving things into the atmosphere, it becomes the catalyst to structure the volumes. Light reveals the solidity and weight of the people and objects in Phil’s paintings. Likewise, the light gives presence to a wall, the floor or doors in the interior spaces that we’ve come to know well in his work. I was fortunate to be able to paint alongside Phil Geiger several years ago, and it was a joy to watch a patch of off-white turn into a shin or a few jabs of orange, beautifully abstract as mark, become light on floorboards. I only wish I was less absorbed in trying not to make a clunker of a painting myself, to watch more of his work developed in real time.

All of this is not to say that the subject matter, the things represented in the paintings, is irrelevant. It never feels as if the domestic settings or the specific street scenes are only just an excuse to lay down paint. It’s all wrapped up together. Just like with Fairfield Porter, the commonplace, even if it be a somewhat staged approximation of commonplace, becomes a laboratory for formal exploration, but it somehow remains moving, resonant to our own experiences, all without falling into either sentimentality or formal coldness. We get to know these people, experience their relationships with others in the painting, and even with the painter observing them at times. We relive their gestures in our own bodies as we look. At the same time, we trace the mark with an imaginary paint brush in hand, follow the routes through the space so thoughtfully arranged and consider the pockets of space created by the placement of carefully mixed tones side by side.

Phil’s work serves as such an inspiration to so many painters today, myself included. His dogged loyalty to motifs, particularly the figures in interiors, demonstrates the endless permutations of theme and variation that are possible in painting with certain fixed parameters. He shows us that novelty is not necessarily the best route to maintaining a long studio practice. But repeated investigations and close examinations of privately beloved themes bare surprising results over time. Sometimes all you need to do is move your easel to a different corner of the room or change the quilt on a bed to open up a whole new world. These slight variables, introduced to an intense and prolonged looking at and living within the spaces you depict, can free you to really experiment in paint.

David Campbell on Philip Geiger

This note accompanies the “Observation & Invention” exhibition located at SFFA Tradewynd Gallery, showing May 28 - July 26, 2025.

The first time I met Philip Geiger was in 1998 during my 4th year at the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts. He had just given a slide lecture on his work and was scheduled to give critiques to 3rd and 4th year students. In preparation for my critique, I had positioned a large “Christ in the tomb” painting I was working on in such a way so that he would immediately see it as he walked into my studio. I was trying to paint it in the vein of Rembrandt and French painter Eugene Carriere — thinly painted in the shadows, monochromatic, and with a “rendered” touch. After about 30 seconds upon entering my studio he quickly bypassed the Christ painting and moved to a group of landscape paintings I had done that I had pinned to my studio wall. Philip pointed at one of them and said “this is more of what I like…those little touches of paint, like Corot.” And I think this illustrates where Philip’s principles lie as a painter.

I believe the gravity in Philip’s work rests in how he perceives value. Philip has the ability to organize and categorize value that gives way for the viewers’ vision to see the big shifts in space, while also providing a way for the vision to slow down and hover around in the smaller and denser zones of the painting. Combine his unique understanding of value, along with his color-spot “touch”, and you start to see a similarity to Corot’s work. Much like when I see a Corot, I want to stare at it and even crawl inside the painting so I can somehow be part of it. That is one of the mysteries and wonders that paintings can provide, which Philip’s work certainly embodies.

By David Baird

This note accompanies “Figures, Flowers, and Fruit,” a solo exhibition of recent paintings by David Baird at SFFA Main Street Gallery. On view April 2 - April 26, 2025.

During the early years of my education, I was always on the lookout for contemporary figurative work and like many painters of my generation, I discovered most of it through the internet. As unremarkable as it may sound, I first found Philip Geiger’s work through a YouTube video. I was immediately struck by his painterly approach and command of values, both of which felt incredibly sophisticated and sensitive.

But perhaps equally appealing is his fearlessness in subject matter. He paints anywhere. And he doesn’t rely on dramatic scenes or curated compositions; instead, he paints what’s around him—homes, interiors, people in ordinary settings—and elevates them through light, color, and atmosphere. This is a quality I’ve often struggled to realize in my own work: the idea that beauty doesn’t need to be staged, it just needs to be seen.

The first time I actually got to meet Philip in person was last June in 2024. We talked about painting and he offered many words of encouragement. As someone I admired for so long, hearing him speak positively about my work gave me a sense of validation for which I’ll always be grateful.

Philip’s dedication to painting the seen world informs a lifetime of work. Both his own work and any painter’s who will take the time to appreciate it. The revisions recurring in the build up of paint will stand as a testament to his own search for what’s beautiful—which is not just what’s out there in the world, but what’s discovered in its translation into paint. The sophisticated interplay of color and value, mixed masterfully one note to another, may to some extent fool the eye, but never denies itself as paint. Preserved in those layers of oil and pigment is not just a reminder to see the world around us—but to celebrate the medium—which is enough to sustain any artist for a lifetime.

"The Silent Worlds of Philip Geiger" by Jeffrey Carr

Philip Geiger paints silence. His portraits of interiors exude quiet, balance, elegance, intimacy, and glimpses of a painterly, poetic world. This is the world that artists such as Vuillard and the French Intimists offered to a sophisticated, intelligent, and visually literate culture that existed for a long time in Paris. As Geiger portrays it, this world still exists, but far away from the noise and glare of the media-driven digital madhouse of contemporary culture.

Geiger’s paintings are meant to be seen, not heard. They are visual rather than literary. They convey no message or controversy. Instead, they depict light, space, and silence. This is the world that Vermeer, De Hooch, Vuillard, Hammershoi, and the Americans John Koch and Fairfield Porter created. It is a fully disclosed world, completely familiar but transformed; the ordinary is rendered in an extraordinary way. Beauty in the commonplace. In an interview, Geiger equated beauty and morality: “I think painting that pursues beauty in the quiet sense that we are talking about is maybe the most moral kind of painting.” Geiger’s work does not methodically record an exact appearance. Everything is hinted at, suggested rather than declared. It is all indirection and invocation. It is all the visual and painterly: tones, touch, surfaces, edges, proportions, and precisely shaded and deeply felt color. A connoisseur’s painting for the true lover of painting.

His sophistication has the most to offer to the most visually literate. Many painters, both then and now, have depicted domestic interiors with women conversing at tables or sleeping in softly lit rooms, dogs, silverware, teapots, and light floating elegantly across the walls and floors. But within this familiar genre, Geiger is unique. Nobody paints like him. This is a subject matter that everybody knows, but existing within spaces, color, and light that is completely Geiger’s own. The meaning of his painting is not in the subjects and people he depicts. It is not storytelling. It is about seeing. What you see is what you get. You’ll spoil it if you try to explain it. If you can’t see or feel it, you should look again.

A CONVERSATION WITH PHILIP GEIGER
June 23, 2022
Conducted and transcribed by Jeffrey Carr
Published in the blog Painting Perceptions:
https://paintingperceptions.com/philip-geiger-conversation/

Philip Geiger, “Virginia”, 2018, 24” x 28”.

Philip Geiger, “Morning”, 2018, 24” x 26”.

Philip Geiger

Philip Geiger, “4 p.m.”, 2001, 24’ x 18”

By John Lee

This note accompanies the “Hiding in Broad Daylight” exhibition located at SFFA Main Street Gallery, showing February 26 - March 22, 2025.

I have a postcard with a 1989 image of a Philip Geiger painting that I acquired in the mid-90s. I have looked at the image often, and over the years realized that it is the background spaces that I am particularly drawn to in Philip’s work. I tend to look past the foreground figures and get lost in the distant windows, walls, and floors, when looking at his paintings. I saw a slide talk that Philip gave, about 1997, and I thought to myself that Philip painted the figures only as an excuse to paint the interior space. Of course this is not true, but I believe that Philip’s work both incited and affirmed my personal interest in the light and mood of interior spaces in painting.

By Dean Fisher

This note accompanies “A Show of Portraits” exhibition located at SFFA Tradewynd Gallery, showing March 23 - May 10, 2025.

I have been a big fan of Philip Geiger’s paintings for a long time.

To my eyes, he is one of the most “natural” contemporary painters I know of.

The quality of his mark making, the subjects he chooses to paint and the light which bathes all of the forms in his work, reveal an artist who is absolutely in touch with why he loves to paint and has the skill set to concisely convey all this through his very personalized painting language.

This degree of honesty doesn’t often occur in the contemporary art world, where artists push and pull themselves in all directions trying to make their work “relevant”.

What an inspiration! You look at a Philip Geiger and it just “is”, in all its glory, because it couldn’t possibly be any other way.

Dean Fisher - February, 2025.

By Lincoln Perry

This note accompanies ”The Golden Age” exhibition located at the Baker Gallery of the Woodberry Forest School, showing January 10 - February 27, 2025.

In 1985, Philip Geiger generously suggested that I take over his classes when he took a sabbatical, and I will be forever grateful. Grateful because I got to spend time with both Philip and Richard Crozier, who also taught at the University of Virginia. We came to be jokingly called the School of Charlottesville, partly because we all showed at Tatistcheff Gallery on New York’s 57th Street, but also because we shared a passionate devotion to painting from life, a somewhat marginalized sector of the art world. Sitting in for Philip also allowed me to meet my future wife, Ann Beattie, and to make any number of friends in the town I soon moved to. Some think of artists as competitive, touchy, somewhat selfish and, often, heavy drinkers. Our little bank of brothers was none of the above. We were thrilled to be kindred spirits living within walking distance of each other, talking about each other’s work, but more often about the great art we all admired. Philip had found William Bailey as a sort of mentor, while mine had been Gabriel Laderman, and in some odd way, each man matched our own temperaments well. Bailey seemed skeptical that narrative was possible using the means we had at hand, and considered his still lives and nudes to be essentially abstract compositions, and Philip’s work shared some of that skepticism about story telling in painting. One can sense unspoken, highly convincing interactions between figures around a table in his work, moving moods in individual figures at rest. Like Edward Hopper, we are asked to supply our own narrative as images emerge from a profound sense of time suspended. Such reveries seem close to how Philip engages with life; thoughtful, quiet, stoical.

Every Wednesday evening Philip and I would cross paths in Brook’s Hall, where a model would pose for three hours. (For some mysterious reason at 8:30 PM, without fail, fire engines, horns blasting, would scream by, and we would know the session was half over.) One could watch Philip’s rapid painting procedure; blocking in large tonal shapes, zeroing in on smaller and finer specificities as the time passed. Some drawing groups are gossipy talk fests, but Philip seldom spoke, a study in quiet scrutiny. Having accumulated perhaps a hundred of these usually twelve by nine inch Masonite panels, we asked the then curator at UVA’s art museum if we could organize a show of three hour paintings by soliciting work from painters we admired. Though we specified very clearly the limit on dimensions and time spent on submitted work, we were dismayed when huge works arrived at the museum gallery, clearly most of them the product not of three hours but of days or weeks. Our brushy efforts of course looked summary in comparison, but the show had to go on. Philip and I never tried to curate again. In fact, I believe the University Art Department never really appreciated Philip’s brilliant painting and unsurpassed gift for teaching. He retired and left for nearby Staunton, where soon thereafter my wife and I relocated as well. This allowed me to continue to visit on Philip’s porch, as I had in Charlottesville usually every Sunday.

Philip’s wide ranging interests include not just in art, but our society’s profound lack of interest in, or even hostility to, what he finds most essential in civilization. Conversation resembles his paintings; clear, considered, highly informed. In a word, civilized. He is a dear friend and a magnificent artist.

"The Golden Age" by Bill White

This note accompanies “The Golden Age” exhibition located at the Baker Gallery of the Woodberry Forest School, showing January 10 - February 27, 2025.

It is a remarkable feature that the teaching about painting in the last 4 decades in Virginia that we can see a pattern that stands out as special as it embodies the uniqueness among the painters as teachers, each in our work, yet a common belief in working from life as a significant source for expression.

I have known this group of painters as colleagues at colleges and universities across Virginia, and I regard them as exceptional teachers as well as talented painters. One of my good friends is Philip Geiger, whose work I own and have found to be a source of inspiration. The interior setting for his painting is of several figures in a living room of a home; where one figure is sleeping on the sofa, one is leaning on the back of the sofa and another is sitting in a shadowy space far away. The figures have an implied narrative, yet it remains a mystery what they have been doing just before they are caught in this moment in time. The light in the room has a silvery tone and there is a bright peach colored outdoor space that is visible through the window. Philip has invented this situation that is from working over an accumulation of days. Painting for him is an act to discovery and revision. He is not satisfied with just having us identify the stuff he paints; he wants it to be an evocative image that makes us wonder and re-examine it with each new viewing.

I have been so fortunate to have so many special colleagues who are also engaged in working from life, each in our own ways. Since the 1960s when a revival of serious painting from life developed, and it was not simply a nostalgic act to reject modernist ideas, like the values of the picture plane, but to reconcile them, making an image that has both a deep space and acceptance of the 2D nature of the painting.

As teachers across the state, we were committed to these shared values about working from life. This was something I felt was important and unique. Without knowing it we were creating a golden age of painting, which I believe was less visible until Steven Francis Fine Art Gallery brought it out in the open, to share theses artists and their work to a new public.

"On Phil Geiger's Painting" - by Janet Niewald

This note accompanies “The Golden Age” exhibition located at the Baker Gallery of the Woodberry Forest School, showing January 10 - February 27, 2025.

Although I don’t know Philip Geiger well, and can’t speak to his teaching, as a fellow painter I can talk a bit about his work. To me, it often seems that painters who work from observation, or mostly from observation, espouse one of several approaches to the observation of color/light changes and to dealing with that great befuddler, time.

  • Observation of a particular place/form at a very particular time, thus focused on a very particular light quality. An emphasis on the momentary, on the transient, with a relatively short duration of time.

  • Sustained observation of a place/form - throughout many consecutive mornings, for example. The light changes a lot within that morning; the painter sees changes, experiences and then internalizes that flux. The resulting painting, is a conglomerate or distillation, of time in space.

  • Super-sustained observation of a place/form. Overall, a particular light quality doesn’t matter so much. Instead, the painter emphasizes a search through over time, like through a whole day, over many days. Constructed sort of like a reef, the resulting painting may be akin to a sculptural understanding of place/form.

To a degree, I suppose Geiger’s paintings embody characteristics of all these approaches. In Geiger’s recent works, the figures seem thoroughly embedded in a particular time as well as in, or of, a specific space - yet the paintings are clearly constructed over time. In a lyrical painting like Conversation from 2016, a cluster of people are centered in a broadly simple, yet dynamic, space. They create a form, held in a concentration of natural light, held in time. I think less of a “frozen moment” and more of a piece of amber.

Philip Geiger, Conversation, Oil on Panel, 24” x 29”

Ephraim Rubenstein: An Early Phil Geiger: "Basketball Game", 1982

This note accompanies “The Golden Age” exhibition located at the Baker Gallery of the Woodberry Forest School, showing January 10 - February 27, 2025.

I still remember the first Philip Geiger painting I ever saw. It made a gentle but immediate impression on me, and has stayed with me all these years. It was a medium-sized painting of a beat-up, under-maintained suburban athletic field with several basketball courts, rough around the edges, with tennis courts and parking lots surrounding (“Basketball Game,” oil, 18” x 32,” 1982). The complex was overseen by rows and rows of gigantic flood-lights, like a set of village elders, going back in perspective into the distance. I say that it made a gentle impression on me because the ostensible subject matter was so unremarkable, so much the sort of place you walk right by on your way to someplace else. I was immediately captured by it.

The view was of the rattiest corner of this athletic complex, where the JV or the intramural players or the townies played, and no-one but your friends watched. And speaking of friends watching, they were here, in small groups, eyeing the proceedings, tying laces, changing shirts, waiting their turn to play, shooting the shit. The bystanders made of this painting a kind of suburban High School version of Sunday Afternoonon on the Grand Jatte.

There are in fact two games going on, one on the near court, with the action all way down at the far basket, and one on a farther court. On the very right edge of the canvas is a snippet of the corner of a third court. What was amazing to me about this painting was that it was such a non-subject. This is certainly not the view that the school’s glossy brochure would display to entice prospective students. Look at the particular attention paid to the dirt and rubble around the edge of the court, right smack in the middle of the foreground. This gently sloping scree is lovingly described with its dirt, grass, or what patches of grass remain after tens of thousands of feet have shuffled on and off this court. This foreground is a prime piece of artistic real-estate, a passage that Leonardo would have saved for his most beautiful wildflowers or strange plants or small animals. Instead, we are given mostly bare dirt, small stones, weeds, bits of litter and a stray dandelion that has managed to avoid being crushed by the back and forth of thousands of sweaty, distracted feet.

To really understand what Phil is up to in this painting, we should, in good Wolfflinian manner, compare it to another contemporary painting of a basketball game, this one by another friend, Scott Noel. Scott’s “Parker St Shootaround” affords us a strikingly different take on a suburban pick-up basketball game.

This is a highly classicizing figure painting (its classical aura enforced by its subtitle: “Hippomenes and Atalanta”) in which Man - and Woman - are the Measure of All Things. Scott’s painting offers a classical frieze of twenty figures and almost a dozen basketballs parading parallel to the picture plane in something in-between a ballet and a stampede. You feel the bodies shuffle, jump and jostle for position in this dense forest of limbs. Behind the first plane is yet another frieze of figures, again parallel to the picture plane.

Now go back and look at Phil’s basketball game. The figures are decidedly smaller, Breughel-like, incidental to the tremendous feeling of space and light that the painting proffers. One way Phil does this is to move the players down to the far end of the court, where they will be smaller. Had he put the action at the near basket, all of the players would have been much bigger, and would have called more attention to themselves. One immediately feels this glorious sense of space and light that opens up before us in this rundown corner of a nameless suburban field. People are clawing each other for space in Scott’s painting, while they are swimming in it in Phil’s.

Phil’s “Basketball Game” has stayed with me all these years, largely because it is very different from what I do. Phil stopped and made an extraordinarily compelling world out of a place that I, without question, would have walked right past. Like Phil, I also paint from Nature, from what I see in front of me. But I have always been very demanding about my subjects. I distinctly remember my high school painting teacher, Francis Cunningham, criticizing a student’s still-life painting, and the question came down to the choice of objects. He said that if you painting an apple, it should be one you had grown yourself, not bough in a supermarket; and that if you painted a violin, it should be a Stradivarius. This seemed a little unreasonable to me as a 17-year-old living in the Flatbush section of Brooklyn, on account of both the home grown apple and the high ticket violin. But I never stopped thinking about it, and I can see now that it became a core pillar in my belief system for much of my working life. What is good about that stricture was that an apple from your own tree insures that the object is an integral and meaningful part of your life; that you didn’t have a casual, detached, or conflicted relationship to your subject matter. Having to peel off a bar code from a supermarket apple signals a barrier, a level of remove from the object, that runs counter to the feeling necessary for a meaningful painting.

Getting hold of a Stradivarius posed an even greater problem, but it signaled an attitude towards subject matter that was operative for over a thousand years, which was, that what was worth painting should itself be beautiful and worthy of attention - not cheap, badly made or tawdry. He wanted us to paint a Stradivarius for the same reason he didn’t want us to buy cheap plastic palette knives, but good ones with wooden handles, sturdy and well-made that would work well and last.

I can see that in landscape also, I incline towards the grand and majestic, the sort of view you have to hunt down, or make some effort to find. I remember feeling very jealous of John Constable, in that, all he had to do was kick open his back door and he was in “Constable Country.” As I grew-up, the sorts of views I wanted to paint were further and further from in the Flatbush section of Brooklyn. Much of the Nature around me seemed spoiled, compromised, defiled by what seemed to me to be our culture’s invention to make everything in our environment as ugly as possible. Finding subjects that I wanted to paint took more hunting down, traveling greater distances, being more persistent. And yet here was Phil, painting the very view I would have ignored, finding beauty and grandeur in this tiny corner of the world that I had hurried past. I should have remembered something that Constable said to a lady who had described a thing that she had seen as ugly. Constable replied, “No madam, there is nothing ugly; I never saw an ugly thing in my life: for let the form of an object be what it may - light, shade, and perspective will always make it beautiful.”

Phil has always been much more democratic, taking up what he find right around him, the sort of place I might zip right by on my to something grandeur. His terrain are those nameless, anonymous places that sew the world together. His paintings urge us to stop and look at what is right around us, what is right under our noses. In this regard Phil’s is a very radical painting, and a radical and inspiring project. He brings to this project and unerring tonal sense, and an unparalleled sense of light, air and space, the very things that Constable says will always make Nature beautiful.

-Ephraim Rubenstein
Ellicott City, MD
2024

"Thoughts on Philip Geiger and his influence on my work" by Benjy Barnhart

This note accompanies “The School of Beauty & Goodness” exhibition at SFFA Tradewynd Gallery, showing January 4 - February 22, 2025.

I didn’t go to the University of Virginia to become an artist, I thought I’d already decided against that. I was an Anthropology/English Lit double major just taking some art electives with no ambitions.

For someone who would have such an influence on my journey, Philip was rather inconspicuous and unassuming. In my first life drawing class, he would set up the poses, get us going and then disappear into his small office to look at some art books before returning to give concise comments and corrections. But I remember being astounded at how I started to see forms and space and sensed the awakening power in my hands. Hearing him talk about our beginners drawings was when I started to learn the language of drawing, of weights and measures and light. I was hooked.

I had many good teachers in that small Studio Art department but Philip became a mentor for me and it was my privilege to be his teaching assistant for Advanced Painting during my extra year as an Aunspaugh Fellow. It was always about what was to be found in the paintings and one word that stuck with me is ‘rigor.’ And he gave me little pushes. I remember him telling me a few days before the end of my third year that his old teacher Bernard Chaet was teaching with John Walker at the Vermont Studio Center up in Johnson, Vermont that month and that I should try to go. I quickly got my application together, journeyed up there and came back with the realization that I had a lot to learn. It turned out to be the same with the New York Studio School, which he recommended me for two years later. From the first drawing marathons and late night critiques, it was intense but I had found my tribe and it was the immersion in painting that I needed. It was also what unexpectedly led me to Germany.

One of the things I learned from Philip is the magic that can be found in the everyday, the afternoon light streaming across a polished wood floor, the turn of an elbow, two edges of color gently jutting up against each other on a blank wall. These are the things the observational painter learns to seek and discover, to distill and translate into paint to present to others so that they, too, can see these small wonders all around them that they may have failed to notice. That is the beauty of painting in its quintessence.

And Philip takes his time to find a way to arrange these moments into a harmonious composition that seems natural, almost casual, and yet is airtight. They are beautiful images about tones and light but also about the human presence, unspoken interactions, experienced states of being. He is a Vermeer among us.

Philip’s paintings usually exude a feeling of calm, with little drama, simple moments. Much of my interest has been in depicting movement, and yet there is still often a stillness of the captured moment. I also learned from him how streaming light can create space, late afternoon shadows scrapping across pavement. My interest is not just in the figure but in the figure’s existence in a space and his work kindled this preoccupation in me from the beginning.

What I admired in him as a fledgling painter back then was his magnificent realism, the way that everything just fit perfectly. There is a lot of consideration and work behind that, and sometimes you just have to scrape back and start over. Over 30 years on, his paintings are still unmistakably his and yet, now I admire their openness to accidents, their efficient abstraction in the same everyday lived-in space. But everything still just fits perfectly.

Benjy Barnhart
Munich, December 2024

By Kathleen Hall

This note accompanies “The School of Beauty & Goodness” exhibition at SFFA Tradewynd Gallery, showing January 4 - February 22, 2025.

I first met Philip Geiger as a prospective student at UVA. I remember him taking the time to converse with me in a shady spot beside the old art building, Brooks Hall, a Victorian anomaly on the austere, neoclassical campus. I came away convinced that this was a place that I could learn to paint seriously and enrolled that fall. Philip’s figure drawing and painting classes became my refuge on campus my freshman year. I remember we worked ambitiously, sometimes large-scale, with multiple models perched about the room, framed by the large, arched windows.

My impression of Philip remains largely unchanged since that first meeting - as someone with a gentle, thoughtful demeanor, who is highly accomplished yet approachable, and genuinely interested in others. The times that I have seen him since graduating he has always welcomed me and been generous with his time. When I have been lucky enough to visit his studio, he is always excited about some new project, direction, experiment. I find that quality of perpetual curiosity, coupled with deep knowledge of art history, to be what makes his work so compelling. Regardless of whether it is a quick study or a large, sustained painting, his work always has a quality of freshness and surprise, and a love of the materiality and mystery of paint itself.

By Aaron Thompson

This note accompanies “The School of Beauty & Goodness” exhibition located at SFFA Tradewynd Gallery, showing January 4 - February 22, 2025.

I can clearly remember the moment I fell in love with paint. It was in a moment; a visceral response to the visual, tactile and olfactory sense of squeezing out a tube of Cerulean Blue oil paint that I opened in the final semester of my BFA. So, when I met Philip Geiger, I was already excited by the material, but it wasn’t until I saw what Philip could do with paint that I realized the depth of potential this colored mud had to offer.

I did not grow up with paintings or painters, or even a family who had ever put any sort of importance on the practice of painting. I did not even set foot into a museum of art until my late 20’s that I can recall. It was through the influence of my mother making crafts, my passing time with comic books and a massive book on Leonardo Da Vinci that I even developed the interest in drawing which I have always done habitually. I grew up curious and searching, trying everything that resonated with me even in the slightest. And then, all of a sudden, that tube of Cerulean Blue and oil painting dwarfed every other interest. So, how fortuitous am I to have been introduced to Philip Geiger shortly after that moment? I knew that I wanted to paint, that was clear, but it was not until I met Philip that I was certain of a vocation or that painting could even be a vocation.

Philip was teaching at the University of Virginia and was already an acclaimed painter, but honestly none of that mattered to me. What mattered was the quiet, raw emotional power he was able to express in his paintings. Leaving Philip’s studio the first time (grateful that we hit it off,) my mind was racing with possibilities, and also - how much I still needed to learn! So, I began making pilgrimages of a sort, from my home in Georgia to Philip’s home in Virginia. I would bring him my struggles in the form of paintings and he would give me feedback; we would schedule a model and paint together. So, I was not “formally” trained by Philip in the University but, he has taught me more about painting than anyone, mostly through example and some slightly cryptic language. He was the catalyst for my going to PAFA for grad school where I earned my MFA and studied with Philip’s life-long friend Scott Noel (who became another massive influence in my painting life) and over the last 15 years I have visited several times a year. In that time he has taught me what it means to be dedicated to your practice by getting into the studio every day. I have watched him continually experiment and challenge himself and his work fearlessly, with a playful dogged curiosity. And throughout that time has mentored me “informally,” and our friendship has grown. I have come to revere him and his family, who are also incredible artists in their own right. I have asked every question I could think of and I feel as if I am barely scratching the surface. I can imagine some reluctance in Philip saying that he was my “teacher,” perhaps out of humility or respect, but as I have told him, he changed my life and set me on this path. No one has inspired me more.

By James Erickson

This note accompanies “The School of Beauty & Goodness” exhibition located at SFFA Tradewynd Gallery, showing January 4 - February 22, 2025.

I began working with Philip as an undergraduate student at UVA in 2005. His Intro to Figure Drawing course helped me rediscover and affirm my fascination and reverence for the human body. He had a straightforward, relatable way of talking about art. He respected us and presented his knowledge and experience as an invitation rather than telling us how to think and act. Philip encouraged me to attend the MFA program at the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts where I primarily studied with Philip’s former classmate and friend, Scott Noel.

Philip’s influence on me became stronger over time as I was welcomed to his home and studio for extra guidance and support in my career and family life. I am grateful for Philip’s honesty with all of my questions and how generous he has always been with his time. Philip and Elizabeth Geiger both helped me see how a teaching and painting career can be integrated into a dedicated marriage and family life. I continue to draw inspiration from Philip’s enduring legacy of seeking and celebrating beauty in the direct encounter with reality.